Traitors in the Democratic West
Back to the War Links Page

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Lev Navrozov
Friday, Aug. 27, 2004

Communism is Karl Marx’s dream of a society without private property (except personal belongings such as toothbrushes), without money, without the government or the police. Everyone takes free what he needs (like salt in a diner) and CREATES in science, technology and the arts, while all the WORK is done by machines.

Early in 1917 the Russian tsar abdicated, the democratic Provisional Government took over, and mass desertion began at the Russian front of World War I. Soldiers deserted with their weapons. According to the Provisional Government, they were deserters to be court-martialed. According to a newly risen politician named Vladimir Lenin, they were heroes who had fought against the “imperialist war.” So in November of 1917, the deserters, led by Lenin, overthrew the Provisional Government, and Lenin established his dictatorship, which in 1991, after 73 years of existence, had no more to do with Marx’s Communism than it had in 1917.

As of 1991, large-scale means of production were owned by an absolutist ruler or oligarchy, which was anything but new in history, while consumer goods were bought, sold, owned or used privately, which also was nothing new. Communism was supposed to come, but if the country displayed not a grain of it in 73 years, when could its advent be expected? A large section of the population did not like what had developed in 73 years, and “the system” collapsed with virtually no resistance.

Those Anglo-American Communists and fellow travelers who passed secret nuclear data to Stalin’s Russia did so because they were afraid that, having obtained “the atom bomb,” the United States would destroy COMMUNIST Russia if the latter did not have “the atom bomb” to retaliate. They were traitors for the sake of Communism.

As stated above, there was not a grain of Communism in Soviet Russia. These traitors projected their beautiful dream of Communism on Stalin’s Russia, one of the ugliest societies in recorded history.

To what extent these traitors helped Stalin to obtain “the atom bomb” by 1949 is immaterial. The United States did not attack Russia when the United States had a monopoly on nuclear weapons from 1945 to 1949, and the United States would not have attacked Russia after 1949 even if Russia had had no nuclear weapons.

The United States was not the British Empire, which conquered India but did not allow Hindus to come and live in Britain. A pre-emptive conquest of Russia by the United States promised ruinous expenses and grievous troubles. For what? Natural resources, such as gold, were not as valuable as before Adam Smith, who proclaimed that the basis of national wealth is production. Today it is easy to visualize a pre-emptive U.S. war on Stalin’s Russia. Multiply the war in Iraq 10 or 100 times.

So the traitors who passed secret nuclear data to Stalin’s Russia were worried for no reason about a U.S. attack on non-nuclear Russia.

Equally absurd is to consider that Russia from 1917 to 1991 was “left wing,” in contrast to Hitler’s National Socialism, which was allegedly “right wing.” Yes, American “leftists,” including Communists, believed in their dream of the leftist Soviet Russia versus the rightist, reactionary and benighted Nazi Germany.

But take, for example, Robert Hanssen, a traitor of the last quarter of the 20th century. He was a conservative, a right-winger, a “patriot,” an exemplary churchgoer – and a top official of the FBI. He betrayed the United States to “Communist” Russia, and continued to be a spy after 1991 as well.

In the past quarter-century or so, the geostrategic situation of 1939-1945 has been reversed.

In 1939-1945 it was the United States developing a superweapon in the Manhattan Project, while Germany – and then Russia after WWII – were eager to know what the United States had been doing in that field, and Stalin learned it through a dozen or so Anglo-American traitors anxious to save their imaginary Communism in Russia from the U.S. reactionaries in possession of “the atom bomb.”

In the past quarter of a century, it was first Russia that was developing superweapons, from 1970 to 1991, and in 1986 China launched seven “Manhattan Projects,” that is, the development of seven superweapons in seven fields, including nanotechnology. The role of traitors in the United States has been not the passing of secret information about the U.S. Manhattan Project to first Russia and then China (there has been no Manhattan Project in the United States for the development of nano superweapons, such as nanoweapons), but to pretend that such Manhattan Projects did not exist in Russia from 1970 to 1991 and have not existed in China since 1986.

Every column of mine on “the China threat” evokes much e-mail. All these readers are horrified that I am a voice in the wilderness, and they beg me, “Keep up your good work!” But these readers are not publicly audible or visible. Yet at least I know that there are true American patriots, even if publicly inaudible and invisible.

Now, what can be said about those who fill the media and publicly display their oblivion of “the China threat” while talking for years around the clock about the world danger of Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction,” its future nuclear weapons, and its participation in 9/11?

Those nuclear traitors and the traitor Robert Hanssen did damage to the United States. But those who deliberately do not notice “the China threat” or sell to the Chinese dictators whatever is necessary for their development of post-nuclear superweapons, including nano superweapons, have been doing far greater and perhaps fatal damage to the United States and the West in general.

The tragic irony is that their number is not a dozen, as in the passing of secret nuclear data to Stalin’s Russia, nor one (Robert Hanssen). They are legion. Possibly a majority of the American people or of the population of all Western countries.

The only analogy is the oblivion of “the Nazi threat” in the democratic West until Hitler grabbed the “rump” of Czechoslovakia in 1939. King Edward VIII of England, who was caught by newsreel cameras giving a Nazi salute, is a worthy symbol of mass treason (or mass insanity) of the democratic West before 1939.

Remember the photographs of 1938 depicting the sea of rapturous humanity flooding the streets of London, and Chamberlain riding through the sea of joy because he had brought Hitler’s signature under their mutual obligation to keep “peace for our time.” The car carrying the joyous Chamberlain could barely move – the English people wanted to express their joy to the joyous Chamberlain.

Fortunately for England, Hitler, after he gobbled up France (with the British troops in France running for their lives), invaded Russia and got bogged down. Otherwise the destiny of Britain could have been different and the joy in 1938 would have been replaced by the sorrow of the worst defeat in English history.

Even more fortunately for the democratic West, Hitler, instead of concentrating on the development of nuclear weapons, launched a conventional war that absorbed all his resources. Otherwise there could be a poster: one half of it – the Londoners rejoice in 1938 that Hitler has proved once again that he is a champion of peace, and the other half – London and New York after the explosion of Hitler’s two “atom bombs.”

Traitors are visualized as lonely individuals. This is a delusion. A nation may be betrayed by its substantial minority, or even by its majority: mass self-betrayal, so to speak. Mass traitors betray their nation and themselves. They are not put on trial. They are judged by history, and the sentence is mass annihilation or slavery.

* * * * *

For information about Drexler’s Foresight Institute and its lobbying in Congress, see www.foresight.org

To learn more about the Chris Phoenix report, suggesting a “nano Manhattan Project,” go to crnano.org.

For information about the Center for the Survival of Western Democracies, Inc., including how you can help, please e-mail me at navlev@cloud9.net.

The link to my book online is www.levnavrozov.com. You can also request our webmaster@levnavrozov.com to send you by e-mail my outline of my book.