Saddam In Custody -- Moore, Soros, Dean Still At Large
Back to the Saddam Page
Back to the Hollyweird Stoopid Stars Page

townhall.com
Ann Coulter

July 1, 2004

The Americanization of Iraq proceeds at an astonishing pace, the Iraqis are taking to freedom like fish to water, and the possibilities for this nation are endless. It's hard to say who's more upset about these developments: the last vestiges of pro-Hussein Baathist resistance in Iraq or John Kerry's campaign manager.

The New York Times ran a front-page news story on Sunday about how life was better for Iraqi girls under Saddam Hussein -- living under Saddam, that is, not the girls who were literally under Saddam, Odai and Qusai while they were being raped. The article was titled "For Iraqi Girls, Changing Land Narrows Lives." True, they don't have to run from Odai's rape rooms anymore. But apparently not a single Iraqi female has been admitted to Augusta National Golf Club since the liberation!

The Democrats want Saddam back.

Of course we can't be sure if their presidential candidate wants Saddam back, inasmuch as John Kerry will be in an undisclosed location until Election Day. As Mickey Kaus has pointed out, every time Kerry starts campaigning, his poll numbers plummet. According to a recent New York Times poll, after $60 million in warm and fuzzy TV ads about Kerry, 40 percent of Americans have no opinion of him. In other words, the ads are working! So Kerry will be sitting out the actual campaign this year.

But he's got a lot of surrogates campaigning for him. There's Michael Moore, who has said he hopes more Americans will die in Iraq. His movie, "Fahrenheit 7/11" as we call it, apparently supports the Times' view that life in Iraq was better, sunnier, happier under Saddam Hussein. Moore has also accused the American people of being the stupidest, most naive people on the face of the Earth. And after last weekend, he's got the box office numbers to prove it!

Moore keeps whining about all the right-wing hit groups out to get him. Granted he's a large target (or what's known in baseball as a "fat pitch"). But conservatives are frankly relieved we finally have a liberal who tells the truth about what he thinks of America.

Then there's George Soros, who compared Israel to Nazi Germany and President George Bush to the Nazis. Soros later denied comparing Bush to the Nazis, saying he had merely said Bush reminded him of "the Germans." Hmmm, which Germans was Soros referring to -- the Von Trapp Family? Katarina Witt and Steffi Graf? Eric Braeden from "The Young and the Restless"? Wouldn't Soros like Bush if he were similar to the new pacifist, America-hating Germans? If not, why did liberals keep pestering us to get Germany's approval before we invaded Iraq?

Soros blames President Bush for anti-Semitism, and then proceeds directly to the usual liberal talking points attacking Israel. He says Israeli policies are to blame for anti-Semitism -- coming in a close second after the Von Trapp-like Bush -- and Israel was a large part of the reason the United States went to war with Iraq. Also oil, which would certainly explain why gas is so cheap now.

Apparently, given a choice between: (a) lifting the sanctions against Iraq so oil sales could resume, for the cost of a single phone call, and (b) a war costing $120 billion and nearly 900 U.S. lives so far, Bush chose (b). Seriously, there are still adults in the English-speaking world with opposable thumbs who believe this theory?

And then there's Howard Dean, who thinks Bush was in cahoots with the Saudis -- and he's the centrist of the bunch. I'm looking forward to Dean's address at the Democratic Convention this summer. Rumor has it he'll end with a squeal so high-pitched only dogs will be able to hear it.

I admire their savage energy, but these people want to run the country. Even with all their money and power, I don't think they could get the Haitians to let them govern. But Soros and company think they should be running the United States of America.

Apart from the fact that Kerry won't come out of hiding while allowing the nuts to attack Bush for him, these aren't random nobodies popping up to endorse Kerry. Howard Dean was considerably more likely to be the Democratic nominee for president than Joe Lieberman ever was.

Soros has vowed to spend $15 million to defeat George Bush this year -- buying himself more influence than the entire populations of several states.  Michael Moore's endorsement was proudly accepted by erstwhile Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark, who -- just to counterbalance his own remarks defending infanticide as "a private matter between a woman and her doctor" -- explicitly defended some of Moore's loopier remarks, which is saying something.

Come to think of it, it's no surprise they want Saddam Hussein back. He made the Democrats seem moderate by comparison.

Ann Coulter is host of AnnCoulter.org, a Townhall.com member group.

©2004 Universal Press Syndicate

Contact Ann Coulter | Read Coulter's biography

townhall.com

Reply 1 - Posted by: lonetown, 7/1/2004 6:45:38 AM Where is Lawrence Tribe when you need him?

Reply 2 - Posted by: Remington, 7/1/2004 6:46:34 AM With a little more maneuvering, it may even be possible for the Democrats to get Saddam sufficiently rehabilitated that he could consider returning to the Maximum Leader business. It would be good practice at getting their own campaign mounted here in the US.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Buzz Crawford, 7/1/2004 6:53:29 AM Ann Coulter is a breath of fresh air......

Reply 4 - Posted by: Intentional, 7/1/2004 6:55:20 AM Ann seems a little flat in this one. Maybe it's the humidity. I'm glad the nuts are out in force for Kerry. It tends to disenfranchise the true undecideds and makes the ambivalent think there is no value in voting. Both of which work in favor of the other party. I think that's why Clinton got elected - twice. Hopefully, the same will be true for Bush. So rave on nuts!

Reply 5 - Posted by: shards, 7/1/2004 6:58:03 AM 16 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were Saudi as is (was) their religious fanatic leader Osama. I often wondered why we didn't shock and awe the Saudis. "And then there's Howard Dean, who thinks Bush was in cahoots with the Saudis -- " Could be there's something about that Carlyle Group!

Reply 6 - Posted by: LEPhunt, 7/1/2004 7:05:07 AM 45 of the 50 biggest buttholes in the Senate are Democrats, as is the biggest butthole their leader Terry McAwful. I have often wondered why America continues to send them to Washington and didn't Shock and Awe them out of office...and then there's the Clintons, who many think are in cohoots with the Anti-American,Leftist,Communists...could be there is something about that DNC group.

Reply 7 - Posted by: gremlin, 7/1/2004 7:28:35 AM Ann...sigh...Coulter! Even more beautiful in person than in her pictures.

Reply 8 - Posted by: YY4U, 7/1/2004 7:45:36 AM I could not break the code on why the Democrats were so supportive of Saddam. This a.m., however, on Fox and Friends, a ME Expert was discussing Saddam's upcoming trial. He claims that in Saddam's mind, he is a great SOCIALIST ruler along the lines of Castro, Mao, and all the others the Left admire so greatly. The Democrats, like all Leftists and the Islamics themselves put IDEOLOGY (in the latter case -- RELIGION) ABOVE nation. Listen to Millionaire "socialist" John Lennon's lyrics..."Imagine there's no countries, it's easy if you try, nothing to live or die for, above you only sky..." THIS is the socialist dream. To Leftists, Saddams rape rooms (and Bill Clinton's alleged rape and sexual predation) are acceptable so long as they embrace socialism. It's creepy.

Reply 9 - Posted by: gremlin, 7/1/2004 7:46:48 AM Good point Y-man!

Reply 10 - Posted by: Shucky, 7/1/2004 7:50:38 AM re 5: am i missing something? when in the last 25 years did the saudis . . . . start aggressive wars that killed a million men? . . slaughter 300,000 of their own citizens? . . put thousands of children in prison? . . order rapes of women? . . put people alive into plastic shredders? . . show interest in WMDs or expansionism? while it is true that there were funding links to terrorism from both saudis and saddam, no command over terrorism has been proven from either, making them about equally culpable on terror. meanwhile, saddam's record as a monster to his people and a menace to the US and her friends and allies is long-standing, self-evident and indisputable. are we suggesting that every government with funding links to terrorism should be deposed? i am willing to go along with deposing saudi, if iran is also on that list, especially considering that the mullahs have long openly supported terrorism and are feverishly working on building their first nuke.

Reply 11 - Posted by: Shucky, 7/1/2004 7:59:52 AM re 5: but usually this saudi b.s. comes from people who don't really want us nation-destroying or nation-building. they are just trying to create a wedge issue. i dont fall for it.

Reply 12 - Posted by: SRHCB, 7/1/2004 8:05:27 AM Saddam for Demo Veep?

Reply 13 - Posted by: laurabusse, 7/1/2004 8:08:30 AM i LOVE ann coulter... there were several 'ba-dum bum' moments in her piece; she is truly an intelligent, clever wit! and an american treasure. you go, Ann!

Reply 14 - Posted by: Conserver, 7/1/2004 8:13:30 AM Fahrenheit 7/11 - LMAO Everytime I think of a 7/11 I get the visual image of a drive-by shooting, which seems to accurately depict Moore's mockumentary.

Reply 15 - Posted by: Tanstaafl, 7/1/2004 8:22:06 AM I'm telling you, if it weren't gor that darned restraining order....

Reply 16 - Posted by: brokenglassrep, 7/1/2004 8:30:00 AM A Thursday without Ann is like a weekday without Rush!

Reply 17 - Posted by: Brown Bear, 7/1/2004 8:43:00 AM James Lileks has a nice column today, Thursday, July 1, which aptly describes the attitudes of Democrats and other naysayers such as #5. Lileks 'Bleat

Reply 18 - Posted by: anonymous, 7/1/2004 9:00:17 AM I don't share Ann Coulter's optimism about Iraq. I believe the country will eventually deteriorate into a fundamentalist Islamic state and possibly split along ethnic lines. I find it implausible that it could be an oasis of freedom in a desert of fanatics.

Reply 19 - Posted by: Conserver, 7/1/2004 9:07:49 AM #18, No shining city on the hill? So, per the article, you'd associate yourself with the viewpoint and outlook of Michael Moore, George Soros and the democrats - they all want Saddam back?

Reply 20 - Posted by: trotter, 7/1/2004 9:09:35 AM A somewhat meandering article, but hysterical nonetheless. And please, are we still ranting about the Carlyle Group? Every time I see someone bringing up this ridiculous canard, I feel the urge to give that person a fresh drool cup.

Reply 21 - Posted by: pineledger, 7/1/2004 9:10:13 AM Don't mean to be picky, but isn't it "like ducks to water"?

Reply 22 - Posted by: gop_guys, 7/1/2004 9:24:10 AM You've got to give Ann Coulter credit. She along with folks like Michael Savage and others aren't afraid to expose what many of us believe to be treason by the liberal element of American society.

Reply 23 - Posted by: pomom, 7/1/2004 9:25:20 AM Like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter needs to remind us from time to time who the real enemy is here. Thanks, Ann and thank you Rush. It's like a wake up call. Do NOT give into pessimism where Iraq is concerned because that's EXACTLY what the donks are hoping you'll do. Our soldiers are still over there helping them with security and with every passing day of sovereignty, the Iraqi confidence will grow and a semblance of order & discipline will reign.

Reply 24 - Posted by: T-Bubba, 7/1/2004 9:26:16 AM So what if he fed children into plastic shredders as their parents watched. So what if his sons raped newlywed brides at the altar and shot their grooms if they protested. That's not so bad. At least Saddam is not a Republican!

Reply 25 - Posted by: wes mouch, 7/1/2004 9:28:08 AM It's amusing to hear leftists say "Attack Saudi Arabia" and "No Iraq War" in the same breath. Morons know nothing about strategery.

Reply 26 - Posted by: dixiedarling, 7/1/2004 9:28:31 AM Along with #21 I'm being picky, but the Von Trapp's were Austrian, not German unless I need a drool cup.

Reply 27 - Posted by: kiwinews, 7/1/2004 9:37:08 AM #5, You do know that Soros is involved in the Carlyle Goup, don't you? Just 100 million, peanuts, but still... Here's one but you can google more easily. http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Carlyle_Group

Reply 28 - Posted by: fritzthecat, 7/1/2004 9:38:02 AM Ms. Coulter is preaching to the choir. No one on the left considers her anything other than a right-wing nut job. I have several friends who are Democrats (they're not all venal, stupid people.) They support Kerry because they truly, truly believe Bush took us to Iraq under false pretenses. They also believe Moore's movie has "some redeeming value." They believe Hillary is smart not just shrewd, and the New York Times is the paper of record. They're educated, intelligent and fully committed to such things as national health care, higher taxes on high earners (a group they acknowledge they are in), a free Palestine, repeal of the Patriot Act, gun control, abortion, and other wedge issues that preclude them from even considering a vote for a Republican. This election, despite the words of Coulter, et al, is going to be either very close or a landslide one way or the other. It's scary, or as Bortz says, "sKerry."

Reply 29 - Posted by: voltaire, 7/1/2004 9:39:00 AM Nice puff piece of progaganda written through the bottom of a white wine glass from one who hasn't put one foot on the ground of Iraq-- I'll read the blogs written by the folks who live there and paint a much more complicated picture of the kind of democracy they want.

Reply 30 - Posted by: WyoEagle, 7/1/2004 9:42:18 AM I love the headline, funniest of the week. Ann Coulter is a sharp stick in the eye of the liberals. I can't wait for her new book.

Reply 31 - Posted by: gobushcheneygo, 7/1/2004 9:43:36 AM "I'm looking forward to Dean's address at the Democratic Convention this summer. Rumor has it he'll end with a squeal so high-pitched only dogs will be able to hear it." Spewed my coffee all over my keyboard ;-)

Reply 32 - Posted by: Pinchem, 7/1/2004 9:45:03 AM Most youngsters here don't remember the day Khrushchev bluntly stated "We Will Bury You", meaning the US. He also said that they would defeat us from within not from without. With the Socialist Party and Communist Party joining forces to take over the Democratic Party (yes you can find this on the Internet in respectible places), with an avowed Communist running for President, supported by people like Soros, Moore, Dean, most of Hollywood, plus the Socialist/Communist Mainstream Media, and that 45 percent of Americans have bought this hook, line and sinker.... Another time Khrushchev stated: "The press is our chief ideological weapon. " It appears that Khrushchev has been vindicated. Democrats should be proud!

Reply 33 - Posted by: Shucky, 7/1/2004 9:45:34 AM The people of Iraqi are and will remain free, not at all in the name of those like 29 whose best efforts have been to sabotage the cause of their liberation and freedom from years of cruel horror. Fie on the evil left! May God punish them.

Reply 34 - Posted by: Tiggy76, 7/1/2004 9:46:03 AM Have to agree with #18. Those people are, and have always been, barbaric. What good can come of them?

Reply 35 - Posted by: mikkins, 7/1/2004 9:49:25 AM For #5. The idea that the Carlyle Group is a wholly owned subsidiary of some loosely defined “Bush Inc.” concern seems hard to defend. Like many similar entities, Carlyle boasts a roster of bipartisan Washington power figures. Its founding and still managing partner is Howard Rubenstein, a former top domestic policy advisor to Jimmy Carter. Among the firm’s senior advisors is Thomas “Mack” McLarty, Bill Clinton’s former White House chief of staff, and Arthur Levitt, Clinton’s former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. One of its other managing partners is William Cannard, Clinton’s chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. Spokesman Ullman was the Clinton-era spokesman for the SEC. As for the president’s own Carlyle link, his service on the Carterair board ended when he quit to run for Texas governor—a few months before the first of the Saudi contracts to the unrelated BDM firm was awarded. Moreover, says Ullman, Bush “didn’t invest in the [Carterair] deal and he didn’t profit from it.” Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball Newsweek,June 30, 2004

Reply 36 - Posted by: wyowumin, 7/1/2004 10:17:50 AM If sKerry Kerry wins the election I may have to move to Iraq to experience democracy without socialism.

Reply 37 - Posted by: wes mouch, 7/1/2004 10:27:44 AM #35, those statements you posted look suspiciusly like real information. They still print stuff like that? /sarcasm

Reply 38 - Posted by: hillarymustbestopped, 7/1/2004 10:30:33 AM Kerry's cheerleaders - Moore, Teddy, Dean, Soros, et al will be his undoing. The PEOPLE (well, the ones with at least half a brain) will not cozy up to these elitist AMERICA-HATERS and all the skewed polls in the world will not help the gigolo ketchup boy and his spoiled hag of a wife come election night.

Reply 39 - Posted by: 53driver, 7/1/2004 10:39:03 AM #28, 'Ms. Coulter is preaching to the choir. No one on the left considers her anything other than a right-wing nut job.' But is anyone on the left as attractive or as brilliant as she is?

Reply 40 - Posted by: RU4us, 7/1/2004 10:49:38 AM Our lovely Miss Coulter really needs to find a husband. Her latest columns are so peppered with suggestive allusions; they resemble the writings of sexually repressed high school girls. However, she is right on point with her major thesis. In fact, saddam has just reinforced it in his defense by parroting the same accusations against President Bush as those made by leading democrats. If Ann needs some help with that other problem, call RU4US at 555 5555.

Reply 41 - Posted by: Conserver, 7/1/2004 10:50:43 AM There are powerful forces that will fight to see that the good news does not get through. Bush will be heavily outspent from now until Election Day. And the free, supposedly neutral media, will deliver many times the value of the paid media in effective support for the Kerry campaign. Here again, most Americans have been led to believe that Bush raised a record amount of money and has a huge spending advantage. The truth is different. The Kerry spots in the battleground states have far outnumbered the Bush spots so far, when you include the moveon ads, the ACT ads, and all the other Democratic support group ads. But that is also something you will not read about. Richard Baehr The American Thinker http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3643

Reply 42 - Posted by: wreck, 7/1/2004 10:54:49 AM When I saw the headline - I immediately knew it was going to be Ann Coulter!

Reply 43 - Posted by: R. Edgar , 7/1/2004 11:09:45 AM Now it is time for the Dems to ride this wave of popularity and re-name themselves the American Baathist Party.

Reply 44 - Posted by: jleev, 7/1/2004 11:12:55 AM Just remember you guys, these are the people who thought the Wellstone Memorial was a good idea.

Reply 45 - Posted by: Thomcat, 7/1/2004 11:25:08 AM Its really really sad the old Horndog lost his license to practice law. He could be in the spotlight for months representing with sympathy another 'head of state' who was hounded out of office. DNC would then have a real meaning - Demonrats Nihlists Communists. What a Party.

Reply 46 - Posted by: Chance, 7/1/2004 12:23:40 PM Ann Coulter is so refreshing. clinton should have talk with her. She KNOWS what IS is.

Reply 47 - Posted by: dot66, 7/1/2004 12:34:13 PM Funny thing Pinchem should mention Khrushchev -- Just yesterday I had the thought (once more) that ''Khrushchev was right.'' Anybody else here notice that now both Hezbollah and China are embracing Moore's propaganda?

Reply 48 - Posted by: Altera, 7/1/2004 12:46:08 PM Bonnior and McDermott, not to forget Saddam's favorite Dan Rather, have had their feet on the ground in Iraq. I don't believe anything they have to dish up. Eason Jordon,CNN's bureau head in Iraq, suppressed the truth of Saddam's tyranny for years in order to remain in the country. Great authorities they are.

Reply 49 - Posted by: cdihlmrk, 7/1/2004 12:54:31 PM Hey #44, I had a similar thought last night. Would the Dems be stupid enough to invite Michael Moore to speak at the DNC convention? This convention may end up looking alot like the Wellstone "memorial service".

Reply 50 - Posted by: Penney, 7/1/2004 1:03:46 PM After hearing Saddam's words this morning, it would seem he received his compy of the dems' talking points. -YIKES!!!

Reply 51 - Posted by: ayatollah, 7/1/2004 2:53:53 PM Kerry and Saddam proven leaders.

Reply 52 - Posted by: Victory, 7/1/2004 3:06:09 PM All I want to know is this: Who plays the Spencer Tracy part in the Iraq remake of "Judgement At Nuremberg" when Hollywood does this trial? My vote is Tom Selleck.

Reply 53 - Posted by: steveW, 7/1/2004 3:58:30 PM Yahoo! Ann on the Must Reads! If there ever was a time when her Treason should be topping the best seller lists it's now.

Reply 54 - Posted by: Chance, 7/1/2004 4:24:11 PM Why are they giving this lunatic a world wide forum to scare the Iraqi people? He sits there and repeats that he is the President, he is innocent, President Bush is the guilty one, and Saddam has done nothing wrong. He actually believes what he says. Will others believe him? Does Iraq believe in a jury of his peers? Could terrorists serve on the jury? Inquiring minds want to know.

Reply 55 - Posted by: RU4us, 7/1/2004 4:43:31 PM I don't know who dropped the ball on this, but right after they jerked him up out of his spider hole, he and his captured cohorts should have been cleaned up and paraded before the cameras while they were signing an unconditional surrender. Until that is done, his claim that he is still the President of Iraq seems legitmate. Backing off from the reality that we are occuppiers will add complications we did not encounter in Germany and Japan. Thank Joe Kennedy for this absurd politics of posturing.

Reply 56 - Posted by: No Left Turns, 7/1/2004 5:04:45 PM Sorry # 28, what you just described are venal stupid people.

Reply 57 - Posted by: Patt, 7/1/2004 5:11:00 PM "Americanization of Iraq proceeds at astonishing pace, Iraqis are taking to freedom like fish to water, and the possibilities for this nation are endless" What is she talking about? According to Kennedy & Kerry it is a disaster over there & the sky is falling.

Reply 58 - Posted by: SheikYerBooty, 7/1/2004 5:14:50 PM We have Ann Coulter, the America hating democrat traitors have Courtney Love. I rest my case your honor.

Reply 59 - Posted by: YY4U, 7/1/2004 5:20:42 PM #29 - And the "blogs" written by "folks who live there" are the gospel. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. Iraqis are trying to survive. They don't have time to write "blogs".

Reply 60 - Posted by: Moogman, 7/1/2004 5:36:26 PM Ann Coulter, I want to have your baby. Oh, wait...

Reply 61 - Posted by: Primal Screamer, 7/1/2004 6:13:53 PM They're letting in the Moore trojan horse (becoming complicit in the DemoSocialistcrats own demise) #47 while also sending Iraq little battery-powered toys that look like Saddam (Rush echo) dancing and singing something like "Hippy Hippy Doo Daah" by the Dave Clarke Five. There's got to be a symbolic comparison in there somewhere. Anyway, it shouldn't be difficult to find an audio/visual recording of Mad Sadr and Splash Kennedy saying something similar about "Hallaburten" and Saddam and Splash saying something similar about W being a "criminal." Two seconds each for five-second total.

Reply 62 - Posted by: warlock, 7/1/2004 7:30:38 PM They do share something. Hussein was truly an enemy of freedom in his own country, an attribute he shares with the others Ms. Coulter names in theirs. They may deny that, but Mr. Orwell delineated their thinking in his explanation of how the Ministry of Truth works. Ignorance is knowledge; total dependence on the state is freedom; it is only when government takes everything that you have that you are truly wealthy.

Reply 63 - Posted by: The Chairman, 7/1/2004 9:07:05 PM Another great article from that articulate, witty,perceptive, and gorgeous blond - Ann Coulter. She is the polar opposite of hildabeast clintoon who generates rage and disgust, at least in me and many of us posters on this site.

Reply 64 - Posted by: BoBo the King, 7/1/2004 9:24:04 PM ''Sorry # 28, what you just described are venal stupid people.'' Well, yeah, but they're so sincere in their venality and stupidity that it must be OK, right?

Reply 65 - Posted by: dblenicklebob, 7/1/2004 10:00:03 PM A Connetticut Wasp version of a Jackie Mason routine

Reply 66 - Posted by: usmcsarge, 7/1/2004 10:16:47 PM "...with opposable thumbs..."! Man, you gotta love it! The Leftoids hate and ridicule her, but this is one sharp cookie (or is it cupcake!). Her logical disection of the dangerous and ghastly George Soros's phony defense that he compared W to "Germans" and not Hitler is both clear and brilliant. George Soros - You, sir, are an idiot! Old marine Sarge

Reply 67 - Posted by: ForNow, 7/1/2004 11:37:27 PM It is sKerry to think about all the intelligent committed Dems who think that the NY Times is honest & think they're too smart to be taken in. And they rule comments from the likes of Ann Coulter out of court from the start.

Reply 68 - Posted by: Dimpled Darling, 7/2/2004 12:15:18 AM Please, 35, don't confuse 'em with the facts. Hey, 31, why don't all of us L.dotters dig into the wallet and send our president a contribution for his cause? Can't have jfk outspending him.

Reply 69 - Posted by: LadyK, 7/2/2004 12:30:37 AM Clever try #40 That was pretty good. I hope Ann got a kick out of your post. Women like clever.

Reply 70 - Posted by: LadyK, 7/2/2004 12:35:56 AM My $10.00 birthday gift is in the mail on the way to the President's campaign. Happy Birthday President Bush... correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it July 6th? In honor of Ann Coulter send in a donation to President Bush!