Now the truth comes out.
Back to the Articles on the Constitution Page Back to the Democrats Are Uniformed Haters of Freedom PageRadio Blogger
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..."
Source URL: http://www.radioblogger.com/#000539
The dumbest member of the United States Senate, California's very own Barbara Boxer, took to the podium next, and did something remarkable. She forgot to keep up the lie. She told the truth about the strategy of the Democrats. She let what their view of the Constitution truly is. If Rose Woods, Richard Nixon's legendary secretary, worked at either MoveOn or C-span, the following part of the tape would be missing:
Why would we give lifetime appointments to people who earn up to $200,000 a year, with absolutely a great retirement system, and all the things all Americans wish for, with absolutely no check and balance except that one confirmation vote. So we're saying we think you ought to get nine votes over the 51 required. That isn't too much to ask for such a super important position. There ought to be a super vote. Don't you think so? It's the only check and balance on these people. They're in for life. They don't stand for election like we do, which is scary.
No kidding. She said it. Here's the audio so you don't have to look for it in an hour and a half audio file.
In one small paragraph, if this passage gets picked up around the 'sphere and on radio, the Democrats just lost their argument. The truth of the matter is it is the Democrats who indeed are changing the Constitutional requirement, because Democrats like Barbara Boxer don't think the current political makeup is fair. Not only should there be a supermajority, which is clearly unconstitutional, but appointed judges should stand for elections. I wonder if that weathered, pocket-sized edition of the Constitution did backflips in Robert Byrd's shirt pocket when she said that.
Game over. Dems lose. Spread the truth far and wide, bloggers.
(Scroll down). . .The far-left outfit MoveOn.org held a rally the other day in support of Democratic obstructionism, and among the senators who spoke was Angry Left heartthrob Barbara Boxer. Radioblogger.com has audio and a transcript of her defense of judicial filibusters, which is quite astonishing...
Comments:
Reply 1 - Posted by: Photoonist, 3/18/2005 4:52:01 PM
There's a good reason none of the US founding fathers sounded anything like Barbara Boxer: anyone speaking like her would have been tarred, feathered and ridden out of town on a rail before they were shipped out as traitors; if they were lucky.
Reply 2 - Posted by: jnorv, 3/18/2005 5:09:51 PM
She makes me proud to live in California. That is why I tell everyone that I live in Texas.
Reply 3 - Posted by: Delakat, 3/18/2005 5:11:17 PM
''Now, maybe it's a good idea to require 60 votes to confirm a judge, though we don't seem to recall Boxer or any other Democrat suggesting it in 1993-94, when it would have allowed minority Republicans to block Clinton appointees. But the Constitution requires only a majority vote. If Boxer thinks a supermajority would be better, she should propose a constitutional amendment--one that would impose the rule for all time, not just when it's expedient for the Democrats.''
Exactly! Wanna change the Constitution? Amend it! Don't violate it!
That it was OK when they were in power when their nominees could have been blocked and now it's of cataclysmic proportions, informs my simply retired military mind that Barbie's playing ''it's my ball and I make the rules.''
Barbie dear, you're a silly twit - shut up and sit down! Better yet...go home and leave government to more sober and deliberate thinkers, or even those who can think at all (unlike you and many of your friends).
Reply 4 - Posted by: usmcsarge, 3/18/2005 5:11:59 PM
This should end all competion with Patty Murray on who should be the permanent stupidest senator (Boxer and Murray trade places as #'s 1 and 2 every time the staffers hold their internal survey.).
More seriously, her words should be viewed as quite frightening. Yet instead of the ACLU screaming for her head, they're marching with her. This is the drastic state we find ourselves in these days. Our future is looking bleak.
Old Marine Sarge
Reply 5 - Posted by: 1940s guy, 3/18/2005 5:14:50 PM
She probably figures, just like the followers of young Castro, that when the new order comes, she will be one of the privileged elites that rule over the peasants.
Reply 6 - Posted by: grey gent, 3/18/2005 5:18:53 PM
Hey, I dunno, but you can understand Boxer better, if you know that you can take her out of Brooklyn, but you can't take the Brooklyn out of her.
Reply 7 - Posted by: mustng66, 3/18/2005 5:21:47 PM
This is what you get for a Senator when your constituents are freaks, wackos, perverts and far left idiots.
Reply 8 - Posted by: SamNJ, 3/18/2005 5:23:12 PM
They don't stand for election like we do, which is scary.
Yes, Babs, it is scary that people like you stand for election. Very scary.
Reply 9 - Posted by: Blackeagle, 3/18/2005 5:45:33 PM
It's scary that she gets elected.
At least Lefto Californians don't breed.
Reply 10 - Posted by: Julianne, 3/18/2005 5:59:28 PM
She is one of the women on the hill that makes me wish that women didn't have the right to vote.
Reply 11 - Posted by: Ratt, 3/18/2005 6:00:50 PM
No Problem here .
Even tho Boxer gets the full Liberal Biased MSM exposure , she could never get elected Nationally.
And with that, a whiskey drink is in my near future.
Reply 12 - Posted by: Duke of Duval, 3/18/2005 6:12:50 PM
"The Wicked Witch of the West!"
Reply 13 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 3/18/2005 6:44:26 PM
My Senatoress, Boxer.
My Congressperson, Waxman.
My aching head.
Reply 14 - Posted by: Society Dweller, 3/18/2005 6:48:33 PM
Boxer is the worst thing to happen to Calee since Greyout Doofus. To Boxer the 3 branches of government are the Democratic National Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the National Organization of Women.
The trifecta of activist politicians with an agenda. Boxer would just as sonn make all votes a unanimous decision or nothing would pass, forget the Super Majority. One day in my lifetime, the Republicans will make history and achieve the Super Majority in the Senate, and hopefully the House, while maintaining the Presidency. It can be done.
Reply 15 - Posted by: Avikingman, 3/18/2005 7:02:58 PM
If this is true, hasn't she violated her oath of office?
Reply 16 - Posted by: Clipper, 3/18/2005 7:10:20 PM
Boxer is the zany spokeswoman as is Harry Nutty Reid from Searchlight.
They both won re-election so its time for them to take arrows for the party. The Republicans should hold their votes and ignore them and do the Contitutional thing and use the simple majority to confirm justices.
Then go after the weak Dem Senators and pick them off like flies. Hannity said they are "unhinged" and they get worse each day. You can't negotiate with them.
Reply 17 - Posted by: usmcsarge, 3/18/2005 7:10:26 PM
Since when do oaths affect Leftoids?
Old Marine Sarge
Reply 18 - Posted by: craige, 3/18/2005 8:10:57 PM
*************
I don't see what the problem is. Such logic is right in line, with all elected federal officials. This includes the current Administration (GWB), Congress, and the Supreme Court. Only Rep. Ron Paul has not violated his oath of office (swearing to uphold and protect the US Consitution). All the others are liars, and knew so, when they took the oath.It is possible Justice Anton Scalia is finally seeing the light. His recent speechs indicate support for the Constitution. Maybe he's been listening to Robert Borke (another rare and honest man).
Reply 19 - Posted by: AppleAnnie, 3/18/2005 8:14:05 PM
Coney Island trying to be Westhampton.
Reply 20 - Posted by: steph_gray, 3/18/2005 8:18:02 PM
Wow - almost makes me feel not quite so bad about having the Twin Terrors Kennedy and Kerry for my Senators!
Reply 21 - Posted by: Italiano, 3/18/2005 8:24:52 PM
Boxer is as dumb as a stump, and everyone inside the Beltway, on both sides of the aisle, knows it.
Reply 22 - Posted by: tofu, 3/18/2005 8:26:39 PM
Let your defeated enemies howl at the wind.
Somebody else posted this the last time Boxer wigged out.
Reply 23 - Posted by: cpmjohn, 3/18/2005 8:27:17 PM
#7, please know that not all of us Californians are "freaks, wackos, perverts and far left idiots."
It's just that most are, and in the most populated parts of the state.
Didn't used to be this way...after all, we did elect Reagan in '66!
Reply 24 - Posted by: Bill, 3/18/2005 8:38:27 PM
#7 I believe there are 57 (59?)counties in Kalifornia.. ONLY 6 voted for Kerry. (LA, SF, Marin, Alameda, Contra Costa, Sonoma)Unfortunately I live in one of these, a situation I am soon to rectify.
Reply 25 - Posted by: LittleHoodedMonk, 3/18/2005 8:40:34 PM
Boxer needs a ''wedgie.''
Reply 26 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 3/18/2005 8:42:55 PM
#1, they probably had women like Barbara Boxer in the early days of our nation... that might explain why they didn't let women vote.
Reply 27 - Posted by: Ranger41, 3/18/2005 8:50:21 PM
I wonder why the founding fathers told Abigail Adams to shut up and leave the Constitution to the men.
How inauspicious!! For the replacement Consitution, I guess the gals'll tell the guys to shut up.
Don't worry guys. The gals'll still be good looking and looking out for you as a useful prop for the right occasion.
Reply 28 - Posted by: thezapper, 3/18/2005 9:12:23 PM
Re#2: Do not feel too bad. We still have Sheila Jackson-Lee and I really do live in Texas. However, it would be my dream to see Boxer institutionalized.
Reply 29 - Posted by: Texas Veteran, 3/18/2005 9:23:25 PM
The perfect answer to Boxer's ravings is for W to nominate Robert Bork for the Supreme Court. Imagine the howls from the left when he strides back into the Senate for his confiramtion hearing. Of course, that would require the Senate RINOs to grow a pair...
Reply 30 - Posted by: fysammy, 3/18/2005 9:28:05 PM
#24, Same here. I live in Mendocino, everyone here thinks she's great. Can you imagine my life?
Reply 31 - Posted by: starboard, 3/18/2005 9:31:00 PM
The grunt queen of the senate. Does it get any worse?
Reply 32 - Posted by: garyhope, 3/18/2005 9:39:23 PM
#6, I used to live in Brooklyn, Brooklyn is a wonderful place with great people. If Boxer is really from Brooklyn, she's not worthy of it. Nobody in Brooklyn is that dumb. Brooklyn is one of the best places in NYC.
What can you say about Boxer. She's stunning. She says things and you just can't believe what came of her mouth and pea brain. You're stunned into dropped jaw silence with her stupidity. You can't breathe!
Reply 33 - Posted by: Norfran, 3/18/2005 11:42:30 PM
She makes me want to burn all my boxer shorts. I wish she would change her name to Barbara Briefs
Reply 34 - Posted by: Islamaphobe, 3/19/2005 12:59:25 AM
Recalling an unfortunate remark made many years ago by Senator Roman Hruska (R-Neb)in reference to a Supreme Court nominee whose intelligence was called into question, stupid people are entitled to their representatives in government. But do they have to be THAT stupid? Anyway, I think the fools are overrepresented in Congress now. I thank God that the vast majority of them are Dumbocrats.
