Bush as Hitler: A Vile New Turn
Back to the Democrap Hate Speech Page
For more articles on this click on the following links: Ads compare Bush to Hitler Hitler ad compares MoveOn.org to Bush
Reprinted from NewsMax.com
Tammy Bruce
Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2004
The leftist extremists now in charge of the Democratic Party are either so desperate or delusional they are now comparing this nation to Hitler’s Third Reich and the president to Hitler himself. http://www.rnc.org/Newsroom/Releases/Jan04/MoveOn2.htm
Moveon.org Voter Fund has sponsored a commercial "contest" encouraging people "to help us find the most creative, clear and memorable ideas for ads that tell the truth about George Bush's policies." Two of those submissions ran on the Moveon.org site and directly compared President Bush to Hitler and this nation’s policies with the Third Reich's.
Upon seeing the ad, one has to ask, do they really believe this garbage? Are they so ill that they really think this, or are they so ill that they don’t believe it but are willing to subject this nation to the accusation? Either way you look at it, it is beyond the pale, to say nothing of obscenely absurd.
Hitler’s Third Reich was a nation that invaded nations to enslave them and murdered tens of millions of people worldwide. Twelve million people died in the Nazi death camps. Ultimately, 61 million lives were lost because of Adolf Hitler’s Jew-hatred and desire for world conquest.
And President Bush? Two nations liberated from despotic rulers who terrorized, tortured and murdered their own people. Afghanistan has just completed its Constitution bringing the Afghan people closer to democracy and freedom.
The people of Iraq are free from wood chippers and plastic shredders for men, rape rooms for women, and can only now recover their loved ones from mass graves and lay them to true rest. Freedom and democracy will be theirs soon.
The liberation of two nations lost and condemned to hopelessness and misery. The inclusion of women in government, schooling for girls, a free press, choosing one’s own government, the joy and hope only democracy can bring.
All at the cost of fewer than 500 American lives. While I cringe at one American death, so few comparatively make a statement about the capabilities of this nation, our military and our intentions.
Depraved
The people at Moveon.org and similar malevolent leftists in this nation are hoping to make others like them happy with an agenda meant to color this monumental human liberation success story as a depraved failure. I shudder to think about the type of person who is disgusted by freedom,
democracy, success and happiness. I shudder at today’s leftists.
One person probably quite pleased with such outrageous obscenity is Moveon.org’s $5-million man, their major funder billionaire leftist George Soros.
When Ed Gillespie, chair of the Republican National Committee, expressed outrage over the Hitler commercials and said the organization should apologize, Moveon.org agreed that the ads were in “poor taste” and that it didn’t “support the sentiment.”
Really? That’s odd, considering the comparison of Bush to Hitler, though disgusting, is not new or surprising. It was an analogy first introduced by their man Soros himself.
In a November 2003 Washington Post interview, Soros introduced the comparison of Bush to Hitler.
Soros said he believed the White House was guided by a "supremacist ideology," and "America, under Bush, is a danger to the world ... When I hear Bush say, 'You're either with us or against us,' it reminds me of the Germans ... My experiences under Nazi and Soviet rule have sensitized me."
He seemed determined to set an undeniable tone and agenda. Why wouldn’t the individuals vying for a commercial to air not want it to mirror the thoughts and attitudes of the organization’s primary funder?
Soros the Narcissist
With Soros pouring tens of millions into what he has declared a life and death effort to defeat the president, there is also another possible answer to the depraved and vile nature of this "new" Democratic approach — a malignant narcissist projecting his own demons onto the political landscape.
In my book "The Death of Right and Wrong," I describe elements in the canon of the psychological underpinnings of “projection” by malignant narcissists. The definition of projection from orthodox psychology texts explains this as projecting one’s own unconscious or undesirable characteristics onto an opponent. As an example, an aggressive man accuses other people of being hostile or a cheat who is sure that everyone else is dishonest.
Why do I bring this up regarding Soros, his obsession with President Bush and bizarre analogy of our president with Jew-hating, country-destroying control freak Hitler?
Consider his own remarkable admission. Soros, who is Jewish, in a speech to Jewish Funders Network astoundingly blamed the cause of anti-Semitism on Israel and then on himself. http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=13428&intcategoryid=4
After blaming Israel and the U.S. for causing anti-Semitism and citing the Malaysian prime minister’s statement that the “Jews rule the world by proxy,” Soros then confessed: "I'm also very concerned about my own role because the new anti-Semitism holds that the Jews rule the world. As an unintended consequence of my actions, I also contribute to that image."
Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League appropriately called Soros’ remarks “obscene” and declared: "He buys into the stereotype. It's a simplistic, counterproductive, biased and bigoted perception of what's out there. It's blaming the victim for all of Israel's and the Jewish people's ills.”
Immediately after Soros’ remarks, Michael Steinhardt, the man who invited Soros to speak, took the podium and had this to say by way of an explanation (and Freudian slip) of the billionaire leftist’s apparent disdain for Jews: "George Soros does not think Jews should be hated any more than they deserve to be."
That certainly clears everything right up.
Horror in the Mirror
Most of us use other people and actions as benchmarks of what, or what not, to become. I contend that jealousy and envy are at the heart of the terrorism we now face. It is felt by Arabs against Jews and Israel, because Israel, by counterpoint, exposes what the Arab world will never become: productive, progressive and free. Israel shows them what they are not.
Radical Islamists hate us because we are beautiful, and with our existence provide a constant reminder of what relying on religion alone will never bring, let alone a religion that uses apartheid to segregate and discriminate against women. The United States, by simple counterpoint, reminds sick backward Islamic fundamentalists that they are sick backward Islamic fundamentalists.
And our very own homegrown leftists? I think it’s safe to say that George Soros and his newly bought minions hate and fear George W. Bush because he has something they never will and which cannot be bought-- integrity, compassion and courage. George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it.
Ironically, the only person in this drama who is pointing fingers at and complaining about Jews while funding his own internal political machine with the sole agenda of bringing down a president is George Soros. Something strangely similar happened in 1933 Germany.
And here I was wondering why everyone at Moveon.org wears a brown shirt.
Tammy Bruce is a former president of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW and a contributing editor to FrontPageMagazine.com. She is the author of "The New Thought Police" and "The Death of Right and Wrong."
E-mail Tammy Bruce at heytammybruce@yahoo.com.
Receive news, actions and updates on important issues from Tammy Bruce. To subscribe, send an e-mail to: tammybruce-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.
The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.comBy Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published January 6, 2004Jewish advocacy groups led an avalanche of sharp criticism yesterday against two
potential television ads that compare President Bush to Adolf Hitler and were posted on a Web site run by MoveOn.org.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Congress said the ads were beyond the pale of political discussion. Rep. Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican, called them "hate-mongering."
"Certainly myself, as an American and as a Jew, I'm disgusted by the casual use of Hitler by liberal Democrats and groups such as MoveOn.org," said Mr. Cantor, the House chief deputy majority whip.
"To compare any American president, much less George W. Bush, to Adolf Hitler, cheapens the sacrifice of millions of lives that have been lost by this country over its history and really denigrates the efforts by the American military," Mr. Cantor said.
The two 30-second ads were submitted as part of a contest MoveOn.org sponsored. The organization invited submissions of spots criticizing Mr. Bush's record. Two of the submissions compared Mr. Bush to the Nazi dictator of Germany, whose regime killed 6 million Jews during World War II.
One ad used computer effects to morph a picture of Hitler into one of Mr. Bush.
Another ad compared Mr. Bush's push for war to oust Saddam Hussein in Iraq to Hitler's push for Nazi domination in Europe and said Hitler's war crimes are "2003's foreign policy."
Jack Rosen, president of the AJC, writing in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, said the comparison is "not only historically specious, it is morally outrageous."
Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the ADL, said posting the ads "cheapens the level of political discourse in America."
MoveOn.org's posted rules for the contest said it would not "post anything that would be inappropriate for television, but other than that, what you put in your ads is up to you."
Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican National Committee, said the fact that the organization allowed two ads with the Hitler comparison shows that MoveOn.org thought the images were acceptable for television and called on the organization to apologize.
The two Hitler ads are no longer on MoveOn.org's site since the contest ended at the end of 2003. But the Republican National Committee is making copies available on its own site.
Yesterday, MoveOn.org officials said they don't believe featuring the ads was an endorsement, and they also said they repudiated the two ads themselves.
Wes Boyd, president of the group's Voter Fund, said in a statement the ad was one of more than 1,500 submissions that were posted on the Web site www.bushin30seconds.org for the public to view and comment on.
"None of these was our ad, nor did their appearance constitute endorsement or sponsorship by MoveOn.org Voter Fund," he said. "They will not appear on TV. We do not support the sentiment expressed in the two Hitler submissions."
But he also said the ads should be contrasted with the 2002 Senate elections and the Republican use of images of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden to attack incumbent Democratic senators.
For example, Republican Saxby Chambliss ran an ad against Sen. Max Cleland, a Georgia Democrat who lost three limbs serving in Vietnam, that used bin Laden's and Saddam's faces to criticize a Cleland vote on homeland security. The ad was later edited to remove their visages.
Mr. Boyd did promise to create "a more effective filtering system" if MoveOn.org runs any similar contests.
But Republicans and the advocacy groups yesterday said that should have happened the first time around.
"Those responsible for this contest at MoveOn.org should have immediately identified this advertisement as one going far beyond legitimate criticism and rejected it out of hand," Mr. Foxman said.
The two Hitler ads were not selected to be part of the 15 finalists, which have been sent to a panel of judges including liberal film director Michael Moore, Michael Stipe of the rock band R.E.M. and Democratic consultant Donna Brazile.
The finalists range from humorous to biting attacks on the first three years of the Bush administration.
It's not the first time MoveOn.org has had to promise to change its procedures after facing public criticism.
MoveOn.org is a combination of a political action committee and two separate political-education funds defined as a 527 and a 501(c)(4) because of the part of the tax code that governs them.
It is illegal for the political action committee and the 527 organization to receive contributions from foreign nationals, but several foreign Web sites were referring potential donors to the MoveOn.org Web site.
After the situation was reported, Mr. Boyd said the organization would no longer accept any foreign contributions.Copyright © 2004 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved
Hitler ad compares MoveOn.org to Bush
Monday 12 Jul 2004
Written by Doug Powers
One of the faces of true evil in the world today, according to ad placed by "A. Hitler"
A shocking and strongly worded advertisement placed in The New York Times and signed by "A. Hitler" has compared MoveOn.org to President Bush. All sides are now offended.
The full page ad was at first misplaced by Times staff, and found just yesterday under copies of book manuscripts Jayson Blair was working on before he got fired, including "The Old Man and the Sea" and "Un-Civil War: My Firsthand Account of the Battle of Antietam."
The ad ran in this morning's edition of the paper.
In the advertisement, Hitler writes, "you morons don't know what real evil is. MoveOn.org has compared Bush to me, when in fact MoveOn.org has a lot more in common with Bush than he does with me, and vice versa ... hold on, I'm getting myself mixed up."
Hitler's ad continues, "In fact, none of you hyperbolizing pinheads are as evil as me... probably the closest things you have are Carrottop and Bryant Gumbel, but they're still miles away from the hellborn monstrosity that I am."
It's not known if the ad is a hoax, or if somehow Hitler himself has managed to reach out from his seat on the end of Satan's fork at the Hades Bar & Grill to compare MoveOn.org to Bush.
Hitler's blurb has for now put a stop to MoveOn.org's comparisons of Bush to Hitler. Bush fans are also putting on hold plans to compare MoveOn.org to Stalin while both organizations try to figure out how to counter the fact that they're now being compared to each other by Hitler, who was the object of the original comparison.
For now, everyone's just plain confused.
