Annan's Son Took Payments Through 2004
Back to the International Organizations Page

November 26, 2004 Edition

BY CLAUDIA ROSETT - Special to the Sun
URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/5372

One of the next big chapters in the United Nations oil-for-food scandal will involve the family of the secretary-general, Kofi Annan, whose son turns out to have been receiving payments as recently as early this year from a key contractor in the oil-for-food program.

The secretary-general's son, Kojo Annan, was previously reported to have worked for a Swiss-based company called Cotecna Inspection Services SA, which from 1998-2003 held a lucrative contract with the U.N. to monitor goods arriving in Saddam Hussein's Iraq under the oil-for-food program. But investigators are now looking into new information suggesting that the younger Annan received far more money over a much longer period, even after his compensation from Cotecna had reportedly ended.

The importance of this story involves not only undisclosed conflicts of interest, but the question of the role of the secretary-general himself, at a time when talk is starting to be heard around the U.N. that it is time for him to resign, and the staff labor union is in open rebellion against "senior management."

"What other bombshells are out there being hidden from the public and U.N. member governments?" asked an investigator on Rep. Henry Hyde's International Relations Committee, which has held hearings on oil-for-food.

The younger Annan stopped working for Cotecna in late 1998, but it now turns out that he continued to receive money from Cotecna not only through 1999, as recently reported, but right up until February of this year. The timing coincides with the entire duration of Cotecna's work for the U.N. oil-for-food program. It now appears the payments to the younger Annan ended three months after the U.N., in November, 2003, closed out its role in oil-for-food and handed over the remains of the program to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad.

This latest bombshell involving the secretary-general's son was confirmed Wednesday by Kofi Annan's spokesman, Fred Eckhard, in response to this reporter's query, based on information obtained elsewhere. In an email, Mr. Eckhard wrote: "I was able to reach Kojo's lawyer this morning. He confirms that Kojo Annan received payments from Cotecna as recently as February 2004. The lawyer said that these payments were part of a standard non-competition agreement, under which the decision as to whether to continue the payments or not was up to Cotecna."

Mr. Eckhard added that, according to Kojo Annan's lawyer, the information has "been reported" to the U.N.-authorized inquiry into oil-for-food, led by a former Federal Reserve chairman, Paul Volcker.

Labeled as compensation for Kojo Annan's agreeing not to compete with Cotecna's business in West Africa, the post-employment payments were in the amount of $2,500 per month, according to another source with access to the documents. If the payments were continuous over the slightly more than five-year period involved, that would have totaled more than $150,000.

Cotecna officials, who this past April received a gag letter from the U.N. Secretariat, did not respond to queries from The New York Sun about why the company continued its non-competition payments to Kojo Annan for more than five years, instead of the one year previously reported. Neither did the company answer a question about why the payments apparently stopped this past February - just after the oil-for-food scandal erupted into the headlines following allegations in a Baghdad newspaper that the program was massively corrupt. Cotecna earlier this year denied any wrongdoing, saying that Kojo Annan's portfolio involved West Africa, not the U.N. or Iraq. Kojo Annan's lawyer at the London-based firm Schillings said the younger Annan is cooperating with the Volcker inquiry, but would not comment to the press on his payments from Cotecna.

The question now is whether Mr. Volcker, whose investigative brief includes not only criminal acts such as graft, but also U.N. maladministration under oil-for-food, will look closely at the evasions and contradictions that have come from the secretary-general himself regarding the money received by his son from Cotecna.

The pattern in this scandal has been that Secretary-General Annan, until confronted by the press, has either failed to spot or failed to disclose timely information about Cotecna's paychecks for his son. The first bout came back in early 1999, two years into Kofi Annan's watch as secretary-general. Cotecna had just won the U.N. oil-for-food contract, replacing a British firm, Lloyd's Register. News broke January 24, 1999, in the Sunday Telegraph, that Kojo Annan had worked for Cotecna. The U.N. produced an internal report, shown this year to the New York Times, but never publicly released, which found no wrongdoing, but evidently failed to note that Kojo Annan was still receiving payments from Cotecna.

About that same time, in February 1999, a U.N. spokesman, John Mills, told the press that Secretary-General Annan had had no knowledge of Cotecna being hired by the U.N., that Cotecna's bid for the job was the lowest "by a significant margin," and that, "This contract was treated at every stage as a routine commercial matter and in line with the rules and regulations of the United Nations" - a statement later contradicted by one of the U.N.'s own secret internal audits, which leaked this past spring.

In March of this year, with the U.N. oil-for-food scandal by then on the boil, the U.N. was questioned again by the press about Kojo Annan's relations with Cotecna. The answer at that stage from the secretary-general's office was that the younger Annan had worked on Cotecna's staff from December 1995 through February 1998, and a few weeks later became a consultant for Cotecna, resigning in early December of 1998, about three weeks before Cotecna won the U.N. contract. This was offered by Secretary-General Annan's office as evidence that the younger Annan had severed his ties with Cotecna before the company got the U.N. job. A source familiar with the documents now says that Kojo's consultancy with Cotecna expired the same day the company got the U.N. contract, December 31, 1998.

Outside investigations in recent months have added to the timeline, raising yet more questions. In September of this year, The Wall Street Journal reported that even after Kojo Annan's Cotecna consultancy ended in 1998,he continued to receive payments from Cotecna through the end of 1999, as well as having use over that same period of a company credit card. This report is confirmed by a letter, seen by this reporter, written January 11, 1999, by Cotecna CEO Robert Massey, beginning "Dear Mr. Annan" and outlining the terms of a $2,500 per month "compensatory indemnity" in return for Kojo Annan's agreement to "refrain from any similar consultancy or employment."

Now comes this latest information that Kojo Annan continued to receive payments until February 26 of this year - more than five years longer than the U.N. initially implied, four years longer than the U.N. confirmed to the press this September, and for the entire duration of Cotecna's U.N. oil-for-food contracts.

So far, the secretary-general has refused requests from Congress for inter views with U.N. staff, or access to the U.N.'s 55 internal audits of the oil-for food program. One of those internal audits, which leaked this past May, noted serious irregularities with the U.N.'s handling of the Cotecna contract, including an "inappropriate" upward revision of Cotecna's lowball $4.87 million bid, just four days after Cotecna and the U.N. signed the deal.

At every turn, the saga of the secretary-general's family ties to Cotecna raises questions about Kofi Annan's handling of potential conflicts of interest. Even if Mr. Annan cannot be held

responsible for the decisions of his son, his job does entail responsibility for the actions of the U.N. Secretariat. As the oil-for-food scandal has unfolded, it has become clear that U.N. secrecy and lack of accountability evolved, in effect, into complicity with Saddam's scams and influence-buying. By now, between congressional and other investigations, there are allegations that Saddam, on Mr. Annan's watch, under U.N. sanctions and oil-for-food supervision, scammed and smuggled some $17.3 billion in oil money meant for relief, using some of that money to fund terrorism, import weapons, and buy influence with Security Council members France, Russia, and China.

On top of that, only now is it learned that for fully more than eight years, from 1995-2004, the secretary-general's son was in one way or another on the payroll of Cotecna, which for almost five of those years held a crucial oil-for-food inspection contract with the U.N. Secretariat. All this, said the investigator for Mr. Hyde's congressional committee, is good reason why "the U.N. Secretariat should move swiftly to lift the gag order on U.N. employees and contractors and publicly release its oil-for-food program files."

© 2004 The New York Sun, One SL, LLC. All rights reserved

Reply 1 - Posted by: dmeyler, 11/26/2004 2:02:03 PM

What? The secretary-general's son, Cujo took money through 2004? You could knock me over with a feather with that news.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Bob Campbell, 11/26/2004 2:03:11 PM

Give thanks to God and then give thanks to Claudia Rossett for her continuous reporting on the growing scandal. Big Media will not follow the crooked dealings within the UN. Ms. Rossett is doing the job that must be done to uncover the dirty dealings based right here in the United States.


Reply 3 - Posted by: tmcavl1, 11/26/2004 2:03:32 PM

That noose around your worthless neck getting a little tighter, Koffee?

Tick tock.


Reply 4 - Posted by: osu mom, 11/26/2004 2:05:57 PM

Cujo, tell me it ain't so!!!!!!!!!


Reply 5 - Posted by: Clipper, 11/26/2004 2:31:23 PM

Kofi, your days are numbered. One of the 527's is starting a campaign to throw the entire UN out of the US. This might just catch on.
France might be a nice place for it as they would feel right at home with their coruption and they could have all the pecadillos they wish with no one the wiser.
The only New Yorkers to suffer will be the Call Girls.

The current location would make a great Condo and just think of the tax revenue New York would enjoy from that property and the savings in paper from the unpaid parking tickets.


Reply 6 - Posted by: MsCharlotteVale, 11/26/2004 2:44:39 PM

"...on Mr. Annan's watch, under U.N. sanctions and oil-for-food supervision, scammed and smuggled some $17.3 billion in oil money meant for relief, using some of that money to fund terrorism, import weapons, and buy influence with Security Council members France, Russia, and China."

These same schwein are eager to get their snouts into the Kyoto Scam's "credits" program.


Reply 7 - Posted by: pomom, 11/26/2004 3:08:40 PM

When the whip comes down on these two sheisters, I hope they land in jail. Ms Rossett is to be commended for being like a bulldog on this story!!


Reply 8 - Posted by: TeacherNet, 11/26/2004 3:33:25 PM

I'm just shocked!

NOT!


Reply 9 - Posted by: uno, 11/26/2004 3:58:13 PM

Lie, cheat, steal, graft, nepetism and corruption in general, on top of which they don't actually do anything execpt feed themselves like hogs at a trough and line their own pockets.
Good grief! No wonder Bubba was/is considering joining up!
Shut off the money!


Reply 10 - Posted by: suenette, 11/26/2004 4:10:04 PM

Just like Liddy and others have been saying for years.... GET THE UN OUT OF THE US AND THE US OUT OF THE UN!!!


Reply 11 - Posted by: tomr77553, 11/26/2004 4:31:29 PM

Did Jesse Jackson know about this scam? I guess he didn't. The diamonds from Sierra Leone must have his attention.

How much did the DNC contribute to his charities this past year?


Reply 12 - Posted by: cpmjohn, 11/26/2004 4:32:49 PM

What's needed is for father and son to be dropped 5 feet off of a 6-foot gallows.

They should be wearing billboards warning others to not cheat while in a postion of authority...in several languages.


Reply 13 - Posted by: Tulsa, 11/26/2004 4:44:19 PM

hear hear #5. unfortunately the building is in serious disrepair. they've already asked us and others for funds to repair it.

Not no, but hell no.

I say dismantle the organization period.

my 2nd choice would be for the US to demand it leave our shores And to cease funding it with US TaxPayer dollars.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Dolley Madison, 11/26/2004 5:43:38 PM

Brava, Claudia!! Molto bene! Keep up the great work. And I will pray that the president wants to clean out this nest of criminals.


Reply 15 - Posted by: nattering_nabob, 11/26/2004 5:56:55 PM

Yeah, can't wait to see a 527 broadcast an ad about the corrupt United Nations. I'd actually give money to them.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Frances, 11/26/2004 6:07:58 PM

RE: #11...if Jesse would have known about it, you can be sure he would have had his fingers in that pie


Reply 17 - Posted by: felina g, 11/26/2004 6:31:43 PM

If Bush knew what was going on with the scams it took a bunch of nerve to disrupt the graft with a war. No wonder he ran into so much opposition. My admiration deepens.


Reply 18 - Posted by: Forehand, 11/26/2004 7:01:53 PM

As much as I will take great pleasure in the schadenfreud coming Kofi's way, I'm quite leery of who will be nominated as his successor. Dollars to donuts it would be the former POTUS who just opened a double-wide massage parlor. God help us all.


Reply 19 - Posted by: usmcsarge, 11/26/2004 8:00:04 PM

When the story first broke, Koffi said that his son had a "very minor consultig post...." that ended "years ago...". The lies are piling up. The obstructions are piling up. The (conveniently) missing documents are piling up. Etc, ad nauseum. Yet our elite institutions remain in thrall to the UN.

I never thought it would be possible to either leave the UN or get it out of the US. If the scandals, loss of credibility and, most importantly, the ineffectiveness of the UN continues apace, it is just possible for public rage t reach the point of getting out.

Kofi's tenure makes the foolish Boutris-Boutris Ghali seem Churchillian in comparison.

Old Marine Sarge


Reply 20 - Posted by: ForNow, 11/26/2004 8:29:10 PM

The UN is obese with waste & could survive without our money. The only remaining reason for the USA to remain in the UN is to preserve its veto power against the hare-brained & destructive schemes that could take root there. Quitting & expelling the UN will not suffice. The UN including its image & glamour must be ruined for all the world.

Coleman’s Congressional public hearings will be a big start. All kinds of Congressional public hearings taking evidence & testimony for all the world to see should be held on UN crimes, abuses, incitements, & frauds—the sexual abuses, for instance, by UN workers in the field.


Reply 21 - Posted by: bilh52, 11/26/2004 8:33:50 PM

Has the NYT seen fit to carry this story, as well? Rhetorical question, I know.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Halfgenius, 11/26/2004 8:39:50 PM

Yes indeed the fortitude of Ms. Rossett is commendable, she's done a whale of a job under thankless conditions I'd be willing to bet.

I'm with the sarge, I never thought I'd see the day that we'd be considering the withdrawal from the UN. But how can we, in good faith, continue to take money from hard working American men and women and give to this Den of snakes so as to turn around a fund weapon systems for rogue tyrants to threaten us. We no longer need to hear of the UN isuing ludicrous resolutions that mean nothing, the raping of innocents by UN troops under color of law, the gluttony of the UN membership and the coarse reckless manner in which human life is considered. There of course is more, but everybody pretty much knows the problem...at least those of us that bother to read of it.


Reply 23 - Posted by: GeneSmith, 11/26/2004 10:51:45 PM

Right about now is a good time for Koffee Annannann to decide he needs to spend more time with his family, while pursuing projects in the private sector...


Reply 24 - Posted by: daphne, 11/26/2004 10:54:48 PM

Until Claudia Rossett receives a Pulitzer for her work on the Oil for Food Scandal, it will be a worthless, meaningless prize.


Reply 25 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 11/26/2004 10:56:31 PM

No surprise, but what's going to be done about this?

And who's going to hold his/her breath waiting?


Reply 26 - Posted by: danu, 11/26/2004 11:44:53 PM

Bildork the Red-Nosed Has-Been will not take Koffee Kan's place b/c he does not spreche Deutsch.
IIRC, UN rules exclude those from Security Council Member States.
Think the First Black [socialist] President will move to Germany? or Rwanda?


Reply 27 - Posted by: Tuxedo, 11/27/2004 1:31:12 AM

Oh, I'm shocked. I tell ya, I'm really shocked! How could this be?

The UN? Well, never mind...


Reply 28 - Posted by: mama meatballs, 11/27/2004 3:46:35 AM

Children starved and soldiers died while Annan, Jr. greased his palm with oil for food....
that's blood money.